Tuesday, August 30, 2011

FIRE GROUND HYDRAULICS

Fire ground hydraulics is the study of how water or foam solutions move through pumps  hoses and nozzles .
The  concept of pressure : Anyone who must prepare for and execute an effective foam attack on petro chemical fire must understant concept of pressure.
pressure is the execution force applied over area,there are three kinds of pressures
1.Elevation pressure (head pressure)
2.Static pressure ( pressure pressure)
3.Velocity pressure( nozzle pressure)


1.ELEVATION PRESSURE (head pressure):
         It is the force provided by the elevated supply of water.A coumn of water one foot a pressure of .433psi (.03bar) at he base of the column,pressure at the base of the coumn is called elevation pressure or head pressure

2. STATIC PRESSURE. pressure in hydraulic system is also crated by external force such as pumping air in to the hydraulic system



3,VELOCITY PRESSURE. Water flowing thorough a hydraulic system creates third kind of pressure is called velocity pressure






CONCEPT OF FLOW:
 Flow is the quantity of water f;owing through a hydraulic sytemin a given time
           Q= AV
when diamete increases velocity decreases and reverse also occurs here flow remains constant so , A1V1 = A2 V2

THE K FACTOR ;


discharge Q = K x P           k = factor of nozzle p= velcocity pressure


following factor affet the amount of pressure that is lost before water reaches the nozle ie. length of hose diameter of hose , turbulance , velocity of water through hose, frictional losses etc.
 eg. frictional loses in hose dia 2,5"
      FL = 117.2 LQ2/D5

'
'

Saturday, August 13, 2011

fire engineering and engineers

What is Fire Engineering?

Fire Engineering is the application of scientific and engineering principles, rules [Codes], and expert judgement, based on an understanding of the phenomena and effects of fire and of the reaction and behaviour of people to fire, to protect people, property and the environment from the destructive effects of fire. These objectives will be achieved by a variety of means including such activities as:
  • the assessment of the hazards and risks of fire and its effects;
  • the mitigation of potential fire damage by proper design, construction, arrangement, and use of buildings, materials, structures, industrial processes, transportation systems and similar;
  • the appropriate level of evaluation for the optimum preventive and protective measures necessary to limit the consequences of fire;
  • the design, installation, maintenance and/or development of fire detection, fire suppression, fire control and fire related communication systems and equipment;
  • the direction and control of appropriate equipment and manpower in the strategy and function of fire fighting and rescue operations;
  • Post-fire investigation and analysis, evaluation and feedback.

A Fire Engineer

A fire engineer, by education, training and experience: understands
  • the nature and characteristics of fire and the mechanisms of fire
  • spread and the control of fire and the associated products of combustion
  • understands how fires originate
  • spread within and outside buildings/structures
  • can be detected, controlled, and/or extinguished
  • is able to anticipate the behaviour of materials, structures, machines, apparatus, and processes as related to the protection of life, property and the environment from fire
  • has an understanding of the interactions and integration of fire safety systems and all other systems in buildings, industrial structures and similar facilities is able to make use of all of the above and any other required knowledge to undertake the practice of fire engineering.

Supporting Commentary


Research started in early 1998 and over a period of time elicited definitions of Fire Engineering by CEN, by ISO and by the SFPE. The SFPE also have a definition of a Fire Engineer. Other relative information was sought and this included certain sections of the Guide to Membership of the ECD which refer to the Training required of persons seeking to be Fire Engineers.
Other potential definitions being worked on by those responsible for the development of certain National and International Codes were promised but have not so far been provided. The major problem was to produce definitions which are concise and yet cover the subject matter thoroughly and inclusively.
It was considered essential to define Fire Engineering prior to defining a Fire Engineer and it is also important to note that different terminology is used by different people and in different parts of the world and the terms 'Fire Engineer(ing)', 'Fire Safety Engineer(ing)' and 'Fire Protection Engineer(ing)' are synonymous.
Fire Engineering can mean many things to many people and covers a wide range of levels of knowledge and competence. The range of this diversity is clearly shown by the following examples:

Fire Engineering can mean

The calculation of pipe sizing for automatic fire sprinkler systems the calculation of the response to fire of a structural building element such as a beam or column evaluating the life safety consequences of a specified fire involving defining the context, defining the scenario and calculating the hazard developing a package of measures which has the objective of reducing the potential for injury, death, property and pecuniary loss to an acceptable level use and application of appropriate knowledge, training and experience to undertake manual firefighting and/or rescue operations.
In a paper by Dr. D W Wooley given at Fire 93 in Glasgow he proposed that Fire Engineering could be considered under a number of headings and this concept has been incorporated in ISO/PDTR 13387-1. The 'headings' suggested are: The process is about measurements and relationships, backed by scientific study, for engineering application to the required problems, but where experience and judgement can contribute, as in other engineering disciplines. The context is the need to evaluate the fire hazard and risk, and to offer fire safety strategies and designs based on performance and not prescription
The tools are the calculation methods (or models) which describe the measurements, relationships and interactions The inputs are the physical data for the calculation methods derived from the measurement methods (tests etc.) The framework basically comprises the essential core, and transfer, of knowledge, which permits an engineering approach, the education and training of users, and the professional recognition of the discipline.
In addition to all of the above, the 'Training' section of the Guide to Membership of the ECD provides a list of 14 subject areas within Fire Engineering and there is an expectation that applicants for the Division will have a knowledge of at least some of these, at an appropriate level, to that for which they are seeking registration as an Engineer. These 14 subjects are -
  1. Fire Science (Fire Chemistry)
  2. Fire Science (Fire Dynamics)
  3. Fire Protection Engineering (Active)
  4. Fire Protection Engineering (Passive)
  5. Smoke Control Interaction between Fire and People (incl Means of Escape)
  6. Fireground Operations
  7. Fire Investigation
  8. Fire Risk Assessment and Measurement (including Fire Insurance)
  9. Fire Safety of Consumer Items
  10. Energy Sources
  11. Fire Safety Design and Management of Buildings
  12. Fire Safety Design and Management of Industrial Processes
  13. Fire Safety Design and Management of Transport Activities
  14. Fire Safety Design and Management of Cities and Communities
The Training references also state that whilst it is not reasonable to expect applicants to have a thorough knowledge of all 14 subject areas, they are expected to possess a working knowledge on Fire Safety of Consumer Items and Energy Sources (10) and to show a wider knowledge within the branch of the subject in which they specialise, viz: -
  • Fire Science (1, 2, 8)
  • Fire Protection Engineering (3, 4, 5, 6, 7)
  • Fire Risk Assessment & Fire Safety Design and Management (9, 11, 12, 13, 14)
Furthermore, applicants to the Division also need to show that they have :-
(a) Acquired a basic understanding of how to deal with a fire emergency

(b) Acquired the ability to identify and quantify fire hazard scenarios in fire risk situations

(c) An appreciation of the relevant regulations and legislation affecting their areas of specialisation, as well as a working knowledge of codes and standards and the state of the art in their field of operation. These will need to include requirements for installation, maintenance and reliability of appropriate fire protection systems and structures.

(d) Where computer programmes are used by the candidate, or on his behalf, a critical understanding of the assumptions and limitations of computer programmes, in so far as they affect fire safety.
Fire Engineering also has many benefits to the community at large and particularly to the construction industry and those concerned with the mitigation of the effects of fire on people, property and the environment. Among its many benefits, it can: form the basis of design, especially of major projects such as airport terminals, stadiums and large atrium buildings which are of such magnitude that they cannot be designed using present technical guidance overcome the restraints of design imposed by prescriptive regulations/codes determine how safe buildings are by enabling a comparison of safety levels for alternative designs identify topics for fire research and assist in the development of fire tests facilitate more cost effective design whilst maintaining safety levels enable specialists to acquire and maintain leading edge expertise in fire safe design assist the management of fire safety for a building during its whole life cycle identify fire protection measures which have the greatest impact on fire life safety and fire loss reduction, preferably without extra cost.
All of the above has been taken into consideration in the production of the definitions detailed at the beginning of this paper.

These Definitions will be kept under constant review and modified as necessary in the light of experience and/or developments in the field. Today the profession of Fire Engineering encompasses topics such as:
Science: Mechanics of ignition of fuel/air mixtures; chemistry of reactions within a flame; inhibition of combustion, toxicity etc.
Technology: Use of electricity in flammable atmospheres; structural fire protection of buildings; design of fire detection and alarm systems, fire appliances, sprinklers and other automatic fire fighting systems; professional fire fighting; operational command in the fire service; hazard assessment of industrial plant and chemicals; arson investigation; fire insurance; etc.
Psychology & Physiology: Behaviour pattern of persons faced with emergencies eg their reaction to alarms; design of escape routes; reaction to stress and its mitigation.
Management: In the public or industrial fire brigades - command, leadership, emergency planning, cost/benefit analysis and management; in commercial fire engineering management, financial control, motivation of staff, etc
Law: Drafting, implementation and enforcement of fire safety legislation; litigation arising from fires, eg acting as an expert witness in both civil and criminal cases, etc.
This list is not intended to be prescriptive.

Fire extinguisher

A fire extinguisher is an active fire protection device used to extinguish or control small fires, often in emergency situations. It is not intended for use on an out-of-control fire, such as one which has reached the ceiling, endangers the user (i.e., no escape route, smoke, explosion hazard, etc.), or otherwise requires the expertise of a fire department. Typically, a fire extinguisher consists of a hand-held cylindrical pressure vessel containing an agent which can be discharged to extinguish a fire.
In the United States, fire extinguishers, in all buildings other than houses, are generally required to be serviced and inspected by a Fire Protection service company at least annually. Some jurisdictions require more frequent service for fire extinguishers. The servicer places a tag on the extinguisher to indicate the type of service performed (annual inspection, recharge, new fire extinguisher) and when.
There are two main types of fire extinguishers: stored pressure and cartridge-operated. In stored pressure units, the expellant is stored in the same chamber as the firefighting agent itself. Depending on the agent used, different propellants are used. With dry chemical extinguishers, nitrogen is typically used; water and foam extinguishers typically use air. Stored pressure fire extinguishers are the most common type. Cartridge-operated extinguishers contain the expellant gas in a separate cartridge that is punctured prior to discharge, exposing the propellant to the extinguishing agent. This type is not as common, used primarily in areas such as industrial facilities, where they receive higher-than-average use. They have the advantage of simple and prompt recharge, allowing an operator to discharge the extinguisher, recharge it, and return to the fire in a reasonable amount of time. Unlike stored pressure types, these extinguishers use compressed carbon dioxide instead of nitrogen, although nitrogen cartridges are used on low temperature (-60 rated) models. Cartridge operated extinguishers are available in dry chemical and dry powder types in the US and in water, wetting agent, foam, dry chemical (classes ABC and BC), and dry powder (class D) types in the rest of the world.

A fire extinguisher located in a middle school.
Fire extinguishers are further divided into handheld and cart-mounted, also called wheeled extinguishers. Handheld extinguishers weigh from 0.5 to 14 kilograms (1 to 30 pounds), and are hence, easily portable by hand. Cart-mounted units typically weigh 23+ kilograms (50+ pounds). These wheeled models are most commonly found at construction sites, airport runways, heliports, as well as docks and marinas.
The first fire extinguisher of which there is any record was patented in England in 1723 by Ambrose Godfrey, a celebrated chemist. It consisted of a cask of fire-extinguishing liquid containing a pewter chamber of gunpowder. This was connected with a system of fuses which were ignited, exploding the gunpowder and scattering the solution. This device was probably used to a limited extent, as Bradley's Weekly Messenger for November 7, 1729, refers to its efficiency in stopping a fire in London.
The modern fire extinguisher was invented by British Captain George William Manby in 1818; it consisted of a copper vessel of 3 gallons (13.6 liters) of pearl ash (potassium carbonate) solution contained within compressed air.
A classic copper building type soda-acid extinguisher
The soda-acid extinguisher was first patented in 1866 by Francois Carlier of France, which mixed a solution of water and sodium bicarbonate with tartaric acid, producing the propellant CO2 gas. A soda-acid extinguisher was patented in the U.S. in 1881 by Almon M. Granger. His extinguisher used the reaction between sodium bicarbonate solution and sulfuric acid to expel pressurized water onto a fire.[1] A vial was suspended in the cylinder containing concentrated sulfuric acid. Depending on the type of extinguisher, the vial of acid could be broken in one of two ways. One used a plunger to break the acid vial, while the second released a lead stopple that held the vial closed. Once the acid was mixed with the bicarbonate solution, carbon dioxide gas was expelled and thereby pressurized the water. The pressurized water was forced from the canister through a nozzle or short length of hose.
The cartridge-operated extinguisher was invented by Read & Campbell of England in 1881, which used water or water-based solutions. They later invented a carbon tetrachloride model called the "Petrolex" which was marketed toward automotive use.[2]
A glass "grenade" style extinguisher, to be thrown into a fire.
The chemical foam extinguisher was invented in 1904 by Aleksandr Loran in Russia, based on his previous invention of fire fighting foam. Loran first used it to extinguish a pan of burning naphtha.[3] It worked and looked similar to the soda-acid type, but the inner parts were slightly different. The main tank contained a solution of sodium bicarbonate in water, whilst the inner container (somewhat larger than the equivalent in a Soda-Acid unit) contained a solution of Aluminium Sulphate. When the solutions were mixed, usually by inverting the unit, the two liquids reacted to create a frothy foam, and carbon dioxide gas. The gas expelled the foam in the form of a jet. Although liquorice-root extracts and similar compounds were used as additives (stabilizing the foam by reinforcing the bubble-walls), there was no "foam compound" in these units. The foam was a combination of the products of the chemical reactions: Sodium and Aluminium salt-gels inflated by the carbon-dioxide. Because of this, the foam was discharged directly from the unit, with no need for an aspirating branchpipe (as in newer foam-compound types).
A Pyrene, brass, carbon-tetrachloride extinguisher
In 1910, The Pyrene Manufacturing Company of Delaware filed a patent for a using carbon tetrachloride (CTC) to extinguish fires.[4] The liquid vaporized and extinguished the flames by inhibiting the chemical chain reaction of the combustion process (it was an early 20th century presupposition that the fire suppression ability of carbon tetrachloride relied on oxygen removal.) In 1911, they patented a small, portable extinguisher that used the chemical.[5] This consisted of a brass or chrome container with an integrated handpump, which was used to expel a jet of liquid towards the fire. It was usually of 1 imperial quart (1.1 L) or 1 imperial pint (0.6 L) capacity but was also available in up to 2 imperial gallon (9 L) size. As the container was unpressurized, it could be refilled after use through a filling plug with a fresh supply of CTC.[6]
Another type of carbon-tetrachloride extinguisher was the Fire grenade. This consisted of a glass sphere filled with CTC, that was intended to be hurled at the base of a fire (early ones used salt-water, but CTC was more effective). Carbon tetrachloride was suitable for liquid and electrical fires and the extinguisers were fitted to motor vehicles. Carbon-tetrachloride extinguishers were withdrawn in the 1950s because of the chemical's toxicity–exposure to high concentrations damages the nervous system and internal organs. Additionally, when used on a fire, the heat can convert CTC to Phosgene gas ,[7] formerly used as a chemical weapon.
In the 1940s, Germany invented the liquid chlorobromomethane (CBM) for use in aircraft. It was more effective and slightly less toxic than carbon tetrachloride and was used until 1969. Methyl bromide was discovered as an extinguishing agent in the 1920s and was used extensively in Europe. It is a low-pressure gas that works by inhibiting the chain reaction of the fire and is the most toxic of the vaporizing liquids, used until the 1960s. The vapor and combustion by-products of all vaporizing liquids were highly toxic, and could cause death in confined spaces.
A chemical foam extinguisher with contents.
The carbon dioxide (CO2) extinguisher was invented (at least in the US) by the Walter Kidde Company in 1924 in response to Bell Telephone's request for an electrically non-conductive chemical for extinguishing the previously difficult to extinguish fires in telephone switchboards. It consisted of a tall metal cylinder containing 7.5 lbs. of CO2 with a wheel valve and a woven brass, cotton covered hose, with a composite funnel-like horn as a nozzle. CO2 is still popular today as it is an ozone-friendly clean agent and is used heavily in film and television production to extinguish burning stuntmen.[8] Carbon dioxide extinguishes fire mainly by displacing oxygen. It was once thought that it worked by cooling, although this effect on most fires is negligible. This characteristic is well known and has led to the widespread misuse of carbon dioxide extinguishers to rapidly cool beverages, especially beer.
An early dry chemical extinguisher, the first ones had copper cylinders, this one is steel.
In 1928, DuGas (later bought by ANSUL) came out with a cartridge-operated dry chemical extinguisher, which used sodium bicarbonate specially treated with chemicals to render it free-flowing and moisture-resistant. It consisted of a copper cylinder with an internal CO2cartridge. The operator turned a wheel valve on top to puncture the cartridge and squeezed a lever on the valve at the end of the hose to discharge the chemical. This was the first agent available for large scale three-dimensional liquid and pressurized gas fires, and was but remained largely a specialty type until the 1950s, when small dry chemical units were marketed for home use. ABC dry chemical came over from Europe in the 1950s, with Super-K being invented in the early 60s and Purple-K being developed by the US Navy in the late 1960s.
In the 1970s, Halon 1211 came over to the US from Europe, where it had been used since the late 40s or early 50s. Halon 1301 had been developed by DuPont and the US Army in 1954. Both 1211 and 1301 work by inhibiting the chain reaction of the fire, and in the case of Halon 1211, cooling class A fuels as well. Halon is still in use today, but is falling out of favor for many uses due to its environmental impact. Europe, and Australia have severely restricted its use, since the Montreal Protocol of 1987. It is however still in use in the United States, the Middle East, and Asia.

Dry chemical

This is a powder based agent that extinguishes by separating the four parts of the fire tetrahedron. It prevents the chemical reaction involving heat, fuel, and oxygen and halts the production of fire sustaining "free-radicals", thus extinguishing the fire.
  • Monoammonium phosphate, also known as "tri-class", "multipurpose" or "ABC" dry chemical, used on class A, B, and C fires. It receives its class A rating from the agent's ability to melt and flow at 177 °C (350 °F) to smother the fire. More corrosive than other dry chemical agents. Pale yellow in color.
  • Sodium bicarbonate, "regular" or "ordinary" used on class B and C fires, was the first of the dry chemical agents developed. In the heat of a fire, it releases a cloud of carbon dioxide that smothers the fire. That is the gas drives oxygen away from the fire, thus stopping the chemical reaction. This agent is not generally effective on class A fires because the agent is expended and the cloud of case dissipates quickly, and if the fuel is still sufficiently hot, the fire starts up again. While liquid and gas fires don't usually store much heat in their fuel source, solid fires do. Sodium bicarbonate was very common in commercial kitchens before the advent of wet chemical agents, but now is falling out of favor, as it is much less effective than wet chemical agents for class K fires, less effective than Purple-K for class B fires, and is ineffective on class A fires. White or blue in color.
  • Potassium bicarbonate (aka Purple-K), used on class B and C fires. About two times as effective on class B fires as sodium bicarbonate, it is the preferred dry chemical agent of the oil and gas industry. The only dry chemical agent certified for use in ARFF by the NFPA. Violet in color.
  • Potassium bicarbonate & Urea Complex (aka Monnex/Powerex), used on Class B and C fires. More effective than all other powders due to its ability to decrepitate (where the powder breaks up into smaller particles) in the flame zone creating a larger surface area for free radical inhibition. Grey in color.
  • Potassium Chloride, or Super-K dry chemical was developed in an effort to create a high efficiency, protein-foam compatible dry chemical. Developed in the 60s, prior to Purple-K, it was never as popular as other agents since, being a salt, it was quite corrosive. For B and C fires, white in color.
  • Foam-Compatible, which is a sodium bicarbonate (BC) based dry chemical, was developed for use with protein foams for fighting class B fires. Most dry chemicals contain metal stearates to waterproof them, but these will tend to destroy the foam blanket created by protein (animal) based foams. Foam compatible type uses silicone as a waterproofing agent, which does not harm foam. Effectiveness is identical to regular dry chemical, and it is light green in color (some ANSUL brand formulations are blue). This agent is generally no longer used since most modern dry chemicals are considered compatible with synthetic foams such as AFFF.
  • MET-L-KYL / PYROKYL is a specialty variation of sodium bicarbonate for fighting pyrophoric liquid fires (ignite on contact with air). In addition to sodium bicarbonate, it also contains silica gel particles. The sodium bicarbonate interrupts the chain reaction of the fuel and the silica soaks up any unburned fuel, preventing contact with air. It is effective on other class B fuels as well. Blue/Red in color.

[edit] Foams

A 2½ gallon AFFF foam fire extinguisher
Applied to fuel fires as either an aspirated (mixed & expanded with air in a branch pipe) or non aspirated form to form a frothy blanket or seal over the fuel, preventing oxygen reaching it. Unlike powder, foam can be used to progressively extinguish fires without flashback.
  • AFFF (aqueous film forming foam), used on A and B fires and for vapor suppression. The most common type in portable foam extinguishers. It contains fluoro tensides [12] which can be accumulated in human body. The long-term effects of this on the human body and environment are unclear at this time.
  • AR-AFFF (Alcohol-resistant aqueous film forming foams), used on fuel fires containing alcohol. Forms a membrane between the fuel and the foam preventing the alcohol from breaking down the foam blanket.
  • FFFP (film forming fluoroprotein) contains naturally occurring proteins from animal by-products and synthetic film-forming agents to create a foam blanket that is more heat resistant than the strictly synthetic AFFF foams. FFFP works well on alcohol-based liquids and is used widely in motorsports.
  • CAFS (compressed air foam system) Any APW style extinguisher that is charged with a foam solution and pressurized with compressed air. Generally used to extend a water supply in wildland operations. Used on class A fires and with very dry foam on class B for vapor suppression.
  • Arctic Fire is a liquid fire extinguishing agent that emulsifies and cools heated materials more quickly than water or ordinary foam. It is used extensively in the steel industry. Effective on classes A, B, and D.
  • FireAde, a foaming agent that emulsifies burning liquids and renders them non-flammable. It is able to cool heated material and surfaces similar to CAFS. Used on A and B (said to be effective on some class D hazards, although not recommended due to the fact that fireade still contains amounts of water which will react with some metal fires).
An American water extinguisher

[edit] Water

Cools burning material.
  • APW (Air pressurized water) cools burning material by absorbing heat from burning material. Effective on Class A fires, it has the advantage of being inexpensive, harmless, and relatively easy to clean up. In the United States, APW units contain 2.5 gallons (9 liters) of water in a tall, stainless steel cylinder. In Europe, they are typically mild steel lined with polyethylene, painted red, containing 6–9 liters (1.75–2.5 gallons) of water.
  • Water Mist uses a fine misting nozzle to break up a stream of deionized water to the point of not conducting electricity back to the operator. Class A and C rated. It is used widely in hospitals for the reason that, unlike other clean-agent suppressants, it is harmless and non-contaminant. These extinguishers come in 1.75 and 2.5 gallon units, painted white in the United States and red in Europe.

[edit] Wet chemical and water additives

  • Wet Chemical (potassium acetate, carbonate, or citrate) extinguishes the fire by forming a soapy foam blanket over the burning oil and by cooling the oil below its ignition temperature. Generally class A and K (F in Europe) only, although newer models are outfitted with misting nozzles as those used on water mist units to give these extinguishers class B and C firefighting capability.
  • Wetting Agents Detergent based additives used to break the surface tension of water and improve penetration of Class A fires.
  • Antifreeze Chemicals added to water to lower its freezing point to about −40 °F. Has no appreciable effect on extinguishing performance.

[edit] Clean agents and carbon dioxide

A 5 lb. CO2 fire extinguisher
Agent displaces oxygen (CO2 or inert gases), removes heat from the combustion zone (Halotron, FE-36) or inhibits chemical chain reaction (Halons). They are labelled clean agents because they do not leave any residue after discharge which is ideal for sensitive electronics and documents.

  • Halon (including Halon 1211 and Halon 1301), a gaseous agent that inhibits the chemical reaction of the fire. Classes B:C for lower weight fire extinguishers (2.3 kg; under 9 lbs) and A:B:C for heavier weights (4.1–7.7 kg; 9–17 lbs). Banned from new production, except for military use, as of January 1, 1994 as its properties contribute to ozone depletion and long atmospheric lifetime, usually 400 years. Halon was completely banned in Europe resulting in stockpiles being sent to the United States for reuse. Although production has been banned, the reuse is still permitted. Halon 1301 and 1211 are being replaced with new halocarbon agents which have no ozone depletion properties and low atmospheric lifetimes, but are less effective. Currently Halotron I, Halotron II, FE-36 Cleanguard and FM-200 are meant to be replacements with significantly reduced ozone depletion potential.
  • CO2, a clean gaseous agent which displaces oxygen. Highest rating for 7.7 kg (20 pound) portable CO2 extinguishers is 10B:C. Not intended for Class A fires, as the high-pressure cloud of gas can scatter burning materials. CO2 is not suitable for use on fires containing their own oxygen source, metals or cooking media. Although it can be rather successful on a person on fire, its use should be avoided where possible as it can cause frostbite and is dangerous to use as it may displace the oxygen needed for breathing, causing suffocation.
  • Mixtures of inert gases, including Inergen and Argonite.
  • compressed CO2 sprinkler is another design used to fight the electric fires with cubic cylinder of 7 cubic meter starting from 1 meter above the sprinkler level.
  • Novec 1230 fluid (aka "dry water" or Saffire fluid), a fluoronated ketone that works by removing massive amounts of heat. Available in fixed systems in the US and in portables in Australia. Unlike other clean agents, this one has the advantage of being a liquid at atmospheric pressure, and can be discharged as a stream or a rapidly vaporizing mist, depending on application.
  • Potassium Aerosol Particle Generator, contains a form of solid potassium and other chemicals referred to as Aerosol Forming Compounds (AFC). The AFC is activated by an electrical current or other thermodynamic exchange which causes the AFC to ignite. The Majority of installed currently are fixed units due to the possibility of harm to the user from the heat generated by the AFC generator.

[edit] Class D

A class D fire extinguisher for various metals
There are several Class D fire extinguisher agents available, some will handle multiple types of metals, others will not.
  • Copper based (Copper Powder Navy125S) developed by the U.S. Navy in the 70s for hard-to-control lithium and lithium-alloy fires. Powder smothers and acts as a heat sink to dissipate heat, but also forms a copper-lithium alloy on the surface which is non-combustible and cuts off the oxygen supply. Will cling to a vertical surface-lithium only.
  • Graphite based (G-Plus, G-1, Lith-X, Pyromet or METAL.FIRE.XTNGSHR) contains dry graphite that smothers burning metals. First type developed, designed for magnesium, works on other metals as well. Unlike sodium chloride powder extinguishers, the graphite powder fire extinguishers can be used on very hot burning metal fires such as lithium, but unlike copper powder extinguishers will not stick to and extinguish flowing or vertical lithium fires. Like copper extinguishers, the graphite powder acts as a heat sink as well as smothering the metal fire.
  • Sodium carbonate based (Na-X) used where stainless steel piping and equipment could be damaged by sodium chloride based agents to control sodium, potassium, and sodium-potassium alloy fires. Limited use on other metals. Smothers and forms a crust.
  • Some water based suppressants may be used on certain class D fires, such as burning titanium and magnesium. Examples include the Fire Blockade and FireAde brands of suppressant.[13][14] Some metals, such as elemental Lithium, will react explosively with water, therefore water-based chemicals should never be used on such fires due to the possibility of a violent reaction.
Most Class D extinguishers will have a special low velocity nozzle or discharge wand to gently apply the agent in large volumes to avoid disrupting any finely divided burning materials. Agents are also available in bulk and can be applied with a scoop or shovel.